.:[Double Click To][Close]:.

Sunday, May 15, 2011

formal hairstyles for short hair 2011

formal hairstyles for short hair 2011. short hair styles 2011 for
  • short hair styles 2011 for



  • samcraig
    Apr 27, 08:43 AM
    The iPhone is voluntary. You enabled location services.

    Did you read ANY of the news articles.

    With location services turned off, this data was still be collected. And Apple says this was a "bug"

    So you're wrong.





    formal hairstyles for short hair 2011. formal hairstyles for short
  • formal hairstyles for short



  • Zadillo
    Aug 27, 04:06 PM
    The consequence is a laptop with a power cord attach to them feeding the insatiable appetite of the thermo nuclear reactor we call the CPU. For the love of reason and common sense, why can't Apple make a laptop with a day worth of battery powered. How about OLED display and multicore chip running at much lower frequency. Enough with the Ghz BS; what is the different between a 2.16Ghz and a 2.33 Ghz processors again?

    Cinch

    For the same reason that pretty much no-one else makes a laptop like what you described either. The only thing I've seen that even gets close to the sort of battery life you are talking about are some of the Japanese ultraportables that can get 6-11 hours of battery life, using 10-12" screens and very slow and power efficient ULV Core Solo or ULV Pentium M chips. These laptops also tend to cost in the $2000-3000 range.

    I would venture to say that even if you slapped one of those ULV processors in a larger notebook with a larger battery, you still wouldn't be able to balance things out to get 24 hours of battery life.

    And one has to wonder if people would put up with the performance hit.

    OLED display technology at least probably isn't ready to be used for something like a laptop screen.

    So, for the "love of reason and common sense", can we stop expecting Apple to create a product that isn't even technically feasible right now?

    I think if you want 24 hours of battery life, you're probably better off carrying 6 or 7 spare batteries (and the $600-700 cost of doing so and added weight is still probably less than what it would take to get some laptop that actually had a reliable 24 hour battery life.)

    -Zadillo





    formal hairstyles for short hair 2011. short prom hairstyle 2011
  • short prom hairstyle 2011



  • l4t13
    Oct 15, 01:02 PM
    still very good news for high performance users





    formal hairstyles for short hair 2011. Formal Hairstyles for Short
  • Formal Hairstyles for Short



  • KnightWRX
    Mar 26, 07:58 AM
    2) $129 is too much. This one cracks me up. Apple is bundling a $500 product into the OS (and other OS based servers are far more expensive) and people think $129 is too much?

    Apple is bundling a bunch of GUI management tools, akin to Webmin. Was that worth 500$ before ? Nope. Is it more expensive elsewhere ? No. Let's face it, OS X Server was always a toy Unix compared to other big-Iron Unix systems and even to Linux as far as enterprise support goes. Volume management, hello Cupertino ?

    Their old archaic way of managing storage is atrocious and no, I don't necessarily want to hook up with a huge array and run Xsan, I just want to intelligently manage my local storage. No, just RAID1 volumes is not enough, I want my volumes logical and independant of my physical volumes. I want to be able to move logical extents to new physical extents without having to take down anything on the box.

    And what about those GUI tools ? I can't even just do X11 tunneling over SSH to my desktop to run them, I have either run their Remote Desktop stuff or use a 3rd party solution like VNC... What good are they ? At least make them web based (HP Systems Management Homepage type stuff) and join in to what the rest of the industry got clued into years ago if you don't want to code GUI stuff over X11.

    And other OS based servers are not more expensive. Solaris is free (http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/server-storage/solaris/downloads/index.html). I won't even bother linking to all the free distributions of Linux that are ready for the server (Fedora, OpenSuSE, Arch, Ubuntu). The BSDs. Unix server product vendors make their money off of support contracts, not the actual software itself, an arena Apple obviously wants no part of.

    All the bits and pieces of server software is mostly re-packaged open source components nowadays anyhow. Most every vendor out there is using Apache and Tomcat in their web-based products, Postfix on the mail side, I've seen a lot of MySQL and PostgreSQL based products (HP uses both, MySQL I've seen in their Output Manager product, PostgreSQL in their System Fault Management, Symantec uses MySQL for Brightmail), and let's not even get into OpenSSL and OpenSSH...

    Heck, even Apple does this. OS X server is just a bunch of open source components packaged up together. Apache, OpenLDAP, OpenSSH, ClamAV...

    So please, pretty please, with a cherry on top, let's not call OS X Server something worth 500$ and compare it to "others that are more expensive but in actuality are free to download and run and only expensive to get vendor support for".

    This rant was longer than it should have been. I love OS X as a desktop OS. I'd pay 129$ for a Lion upgrade with my eyes closed. Best of both worlds. Unix underpinnings and powerful command-line (everything is there!) with integration for all my server products yet fast and easy to setup GUI that is mostly consistent so as to attract a large user base that makes it a good proposition for commercial software vendors to port their packages to. Apple just never got really serious about the server side of it (and lets face it, it's not their business and they obviously want no part of the entreprise market) and I'm not faulting them for that. Let's not be as disingenious as to claim their selling you a 500$ product for 129$ though.

    I'm shocked at how many people are so willing to just wave away all the nice under-the-hood changes and improvements that Snow Leopard offers just because there aren't any super-radical UI changes... really disappointing to be honest. Does it really have to be all flashy to be of interest to you? What, the functional side of things doesn't matter any more?

    See how this little change in your comment still makes it apply very much to the MacRumors crowd ? ;) The fact is, you're not really dealing with technical people on MacRumors, no matter how much some of them pretend they are. Heck, some of them still believe that HTML is a programming language and that they are web developers because their tools of choice are PhotoShop and Dreamweaver.





    formal hairstyles for short hair 2011. Cute Hairstyles For Short Hair
  • Cute Hairstyles For Short Hair



  • Clydefrog
    Aug 26, 04:16 PM
    same here! I just hope Sept 5th or sooner:D





    formal hairstyles for short hair 2011. Short Hair Styles 2011,Short
  • Short Hair Styles 2011,Short



  • 11thIndian
    Apr 5, 10:17 PM
    I doubt Apple will ship a new version of FCP before they ship lion, there are simply no real video editor APIs in Snow Leopard that are capable of 64 bit, QT Kit is a joke.

    HOWEVER, according to the developer page for Lion there will be a brand new A/V API in Lion that will be 64 bit and FCP will most likely be written in that.

    I guess they could back port the entire API to Snow Leopard, but I wouldn't count on it.

    Rumor is that new FCP will be based on A/V Foundation, leaving the legacy QT Kit limitations behind, and negating the need to wait for Lion for 64bit.

    http://www.philiphodgetts.com/2011/02/a-new-64-bit-final-cut-pro/





    formal hairstyles for short hair 2011. 2011 Cool Hair Styles,Short
  • 2011 Cool Hair Styles,Short



  • raymondso
    Sep 19, 09:18 AM
    0710 PDT - no updates yet - keep counting :-(
    1:40 to go :p





    formal hairstyles for short hair 2011. In 2011 short hairstyles will
  • In 2011 short hairstyles will



  • notjustjay
    Apr 27, 10:28 AM
    "Calculating a phone's location using just GPS satellite data can take up to several minutes."

    Then how is car-navigation working?



    The same thing - it can take up to a few minutes to establish a solid GPS lock. I own a Garmin GPSMAP 60csx (a hiking/geocaching GPS) which is getting a bit long in the tooth now (purchased in 2006) but at the time, the SiRFstar III chip that powers it was able to establish a location WAY faster than the previous GPS units I owned -- but even that meant a minute, maybe two. All of the Garmin and TomTom traffic GPS's I've used take a similar amount of time to acquire a signal lock.





    formal hairstyles for short hair 2011. Hair Styles Trends 2011 (0
  • Hair Styles Trends 2011 (0



  • Some_Big_Spoon
    Aug 27, 01:19 AM
    BTO's

    The update time for Apple's store is 9am EST? I was under the impression that it was 9am PST. I'm behind the times! (pun intended, I suppose)

    Is the 7-10 days for BTO iMacs? Or stock ones?





    formal hairstyles for short hair 2011. Many of these hairstyles are
  • Many of these hairstyles are



  • Macaroony
    Mar 1, 02:22 PM
    @CoCo & Bill: Please, just stop arguing with bogus reasons. The Catholic Church has everything wrong and upside down and only to control its followers. You two are a perfect example thereof.

    CoCo, heterosexuality is not the norm, at least not outside our social understanding. In ancient Greece and Rome, sexuality wasn't even up for discussion. You followed a certain social conduct and explored your sexuality as you saw fit and didn't question it or that of others. When Christianity started taking over the laws and moral standards, they made it so they could control everything people do. Your reasoning comes from the same source as those who wrote the medical journals that condemn homosexuality as a mental illness. They did so out of fear of the unknown - the very essence th the Catholic Church uses to control its followers.

    And Bill, please go out and live a little. Get a nice girlfriend and explore your and her sexuality a little and see how much more relaxed your attitude about the world can be. There's more to life than waiting for God's instructions. He certainly wouldn't want you to waste your life on such trivial things like analyzing other people's sexuality.

    You two need to expand your world view and accept that there are plenty of things that make you uncomfortable, but there is no reason to condemn them so exhaustingly. You cannot reverse progress and you certainly cannot control the lives of other people.

    There are plenty of folks in Northern Africa that can vouch for that.





    formal hairstyles for short hair 2011. Bride wannabe who have short
  • Bride wannabe who have short



  • ergle2
    Sep 18, 11:57 PM
    Key word being DESKTOPS.
    MP machines were server based long before they were included in desktops. I'd like to see where people had dual Xeon based DESKTOPS 'cause I've never seen it. It's not impossible but it's also not a good cost-based answer either. :p

    I've known many people with multi-processor machines on their desktop, with a variety of processor families -- including Intel -- going way back over the best part of a decade. If your requirements include applications that can make use of it, it can make sense. Time is money and all that.

    One market I'm aware of is the fluid dynamics market, which pretty much eats all the processor time you can throw at it.

    I even had an x86 dual CPU machine at home back in 1999... I still have it, it's just not that fast any more...

    Of course, these days everyone and his dog has dual-core, pretty much...

    Edit: 2nd para clarified





    formal hairstyles for short hair 2011. short hair styles 2011,
  • short hair styles 2011,



  • Zadillo
    Aug 7, 03:33 PM
    Hey nice to see osx will have system restore =D

    I really hope you're joking, Time Machine is not equivalent to something like System Restore.





    formal hairstyles for short hair 2011. Short Bob Hair Styles 2011
  • Short Bob Hair Styles 2011



  • Iconoclysm
    Apr 20, 04:14 PM
    Copying is copying. If someone else came out with an iProduct you can bet that Apple would slap a lawsuit on them. The Apple record logo was around for several years before Apple computer. I'm sure Jobs knew of the Beatles, he was a long haired hippie back in the 70's. So the logo could have been influenced by the Beatles.

    Copying is not copying when you don't even know about what was done before...and we know the story about what influenced Apple, the alphabet. And the logo isn't even the same - it's the name that the suit was over, not the logo. Knowing about the record label wasn't on the front page of the newspaper, this was the 1970's...there was no internet, it's more than just a little possible that Jobs did not know this. And you're assuming that logo was everywhere, and you're wrong.





    formal hairstyles for short hair 2011. formal hairstyles for short
  • formal hairstyles for short



  • DeathChill
    Mar 23, 07:35 AM
    a lot of the iphone engineers are former palm employees

    Palm was founded by Apple employees who worked on the Newton.





    formal hairstyles for short hair 2011. formal hairstyles for short
  • formal hairstyles for short



  • Willis
    Jul 29, 08:23 AM
    Does anyone else find the UK store Shipping times a bit long all of a sudden. theyve been like this since monday i think.

    white Macbooks 3 days, iMac 20" 5-7 days?





    formal hairstyles for short hair 2011. Hairstyle pictures for Big
  • Hairstyle pictures for Big



  • Rodimus Prime
    Feb 28, 09:12 PM
    Very sorry.
    I have dyslexia, so I read sentences in my head, not words. When the words fit, my brain just makes that model of what it thinks the text said.
    Sorry for getting mad. :o

    I have dyslexia as well. Word of advise. When ever something gets you all mad like that always and I repeat ALWAYS re read it a few times before posting. I have caught myself a few times. Not that it always works.

    I was about to say something but saw another posted did.


    what it does show is that the brain is wired a certain way. I personally believe homosexallity is both a choice and genetic.

    We all fall on a scale that goes from complete homosexaul to straight. Now majority of people are much closer to the straight side and all clustered over there. Then people who are spread out across the all the way to the other end. I do not know how many fall in the bi range compared to complete homosexual cluster.

    What this means is some people are much more predisposed to be homosexual than others.
    I will repeat there is nothing wrong with it and I have said before they should have the right be married. We have little control over who we are attracted to. We can over ride it somewhat but only to a point. Mostly it feel we take the predisposition and induld it and we go that way.





    formal hairstyles for short hair 2011. formal hairstyles for short
  • formal hairstyles for short



  • Kane.Elson
    Jul 27, 10:21 PM
    Ahh so many announcments !!! Kill me now !

    I'm waiting for the end of august then I'm buying whatever I can get.





    formal hairstyles for short hair 2011. new hairstyles for short hair
  • new hairstyles for short hair



  • Rychy
    Apr 10, 12:51 AM
    Can't wait to see how it works.

    Wow. You'd think a FCP Users group would be able to track down a halfway decent graphic artist to make a their banner graphic...

    lol. I was thinking the same thing.





    formal hairstyles for short hair 2011. wedding hairstyles for short
  • wedding hairstyles for short



  • swingerofbirch
    Aug 7, 08:29 PM
    Well I wouldn't say "Nothing" as obviously it required a lot of programmer time to move the OS to Intel, create the new XCode compiler, create & debug rosetta, re-write all of the iLife, and Pro-Apps offered by Apple, etc. etc.

    But it didn't have anything to do with stifling innovation. I think Apple is just running out of innovative ideas. It happens companies go through dry spells.

    Really, I haven't seen much innovation out of Apple since the move from OS 9 to OS X. That was a major leap. Automator actually has a lot of potential but so far I think it is being under used. As far as the GUI is concerned, I think there are a lot of things that could be revamped to improve that area.





    NoSmokingBandit
    Aug 17, 09:30 PM
    What you scale the difficulty up? On NFS:Shift, I started on easy A.I, quickly moved to normal, and am now doing most of my races on hard A.I. My car settings for traction and control and such is normal.

    I havent played it in a while, but i recall setting traction control to standard, AI to the hardest, and everything else to the hard/realistic settings. I was racing with my DFGT wheel and it all just felt really easy. I was safely taking turns faster than i would ever attempt in GT4.





    dampfnudel
    Mar 31, 09:44 PM
    Well, it's about time Google did this.





    skunk
    Mar 22, 07:19 PM
    Poor old Obama has been dragged into this kicking and screaming by Sarkozy, Cameron, the Arab League request for a no-fly zone and the request by the Libyan revolutionaries themselves. No he hasn't, the stage management has been quite subtle, actually, for once.





    Half Glass
    Sep 13, 10:26 AM
    Wow...a user upgradable Mac. Good stuff indeed.

    I am anxiously awaiting better utilization of all the cores, but the ability to multitask without hiccups is still great for now!

    --HG





    gugy
    Aug 17, 12:17 PM
    "Sixteen Core Tigerton Setup about $6,000" :eek:

    I want one!